Kings College London recently reported that the Pfizer Covid vaccine is not very effective if a second shot is not given in the 3 week window for cancer patients, and particularly for blood cancer, kcl.ac.uk/news/delaying-sec...
Any opinions on what to do?
Thanks
Written by
Naboo
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Hi, had my second dose at eight weeks after first dose. Did chase my doctor for it. Just signed up with UK Biobank for research into antibodies after the vaccine where I could get the results instantaneously. So will see. No guarantees of course. It’s all so new so let’s see. Take care
Hi, no sure what country you are in - your profile doesn't say. But I have been doing bits of research for Bio Bank for 11-12yrs. Not so much recently and then they contacted me and asked if I was interested in this one. Also do the Birmingham research into antibodies, but one doesn't get to know personal results of that one. The latter came up a little while ago through this website. Hope all goes well
There were several posts here about this study a couple of weeks ago when this was mentioned on the BBC.
It was a very small study, from memory 9 blood cancer patients. I have no idea why it was such a small study. We know vaccines are less effective for us.
All I can suggest is contacting your Consultant or CNS and seeing if you can get yours moved forward.
Hi Naboo , Hope your well , in the report it states that after 5 weeks after the 1st vacination the blood cancer group was as low as 8 % they did not test what the increase was after the second vacination with in the 3 weeks , it found that with in the 3 weeks of the second vacination the results were much higher in certain cancer groups ,,so the gap of 3 months exposes the individuals to a higher risk of infection while waiting for the second vacination ,,,,not that the second vacination will not make a difference if not given with in the 3 weeks it's highlighting that we are valuable while waiting for the second one
Hi PsmithukHi yes that's what the report is highlighting that because cancer patients are waiting for 3 months for the second one , we are more exposed than the groups who had it with in the 3 weeks , they would not have had any data follow up for the ones who have waited 12 weeks for their second vacination,
Ideally we all would have had it with in that time frame in line with the original guidance off Bio Tech but hopefully be just as effective as the 3 week interval
Although the SOAP study by KIng's College & Francis Crick Insititute is a small one, it does imply that blood cancer patients will be at significantly higher risk than most, before and after vaccination. Which is what CLL specialists have been cautioning.
In the UK you're lucky if you receive your second dose of vaccine much sooner than the 12 week limit (with vaccine supply issues, maybe just a target now). So what to do in the meantime? Me, I'll carry on shielding, and after the second shot, carry on shielding.
You could have an antibody test 2-3 weeks after your second dose, but personally I would not be using antibody-positivity as a ticket to go pubbing and clubbing.
You could also see if you can get on the PROVENT trial, not sure if they are still recruiting. If you've been vaccinated you might not be eligible, but AZ have changed criteria since the start of the trial.
I have an appointment with my Haematologist next week this is on my list of questions. Second vaccination in June - AZ - should I have second sooner? Will depend on availability too.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.